Donald
Trump has been sworn-in as 45th President of the United States of
America on the twentieth of this month. Before the last year November elections,
majority of political pundits were pessimistic about the Trump’s triumph
against his Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. But he proved all of them
wrong.
Some
experts deconstruct his success in combinatory rhetoric of “populism and
nationalism”, ingrained with racism, patriarchy and casino-capitalism. Some
even argued his presidency would bring a “worst form of democratic trajectory”
in the world’s oldest democracy. Some even gone beyond it and said that he
would be an “unqualified” person in the White House.
The
election campaign of Trump had been highly controversial. One time he talks
about banning of Muslims to enter into the US, and at another time he would say
erection of a wall along the Maxico border and ‘making America great again’, a hyperbolic
sense of nationalism.
Internally
he asked for repealing of Obama Care, an affordable medical insurance scheme
for poor unveiled by the outgoing US President Obama. Outside the US he talk
about fixing of alliance partnerships, revisiting the relevance of NATO, undoing
the climate agreement and some multi-national trade agreements such as TPP.
From
the geopolitical point of view he started to question the Washington’s
states-quo over the “One China” policy vis-à-vis Beijing. He even suggests that
the Beijing’s manipulated economic trade and commerce and geopolitical
assertiveness need to be fixed right and questioning “one China” would come as
first bullet from the Trump’s diplomatic gun.
The
worst scenario would come in the messy region of West Asia. He picked two hot
points in the region. One side he asked for revisiting the whole US-Iran
nuclear deal, a celebrated deal as it put a temporary freeze over the decade
long Washington-Tehran bilateral animosity. On the other side he whispered an
unqualified support to the Israel. On this issue a diplomatic rumor has already
begun that the US may shift its diplomatic mission from Tel Eve to Jerusalem.
The
Trump Syndrome has reached the Europe. A far right nationalist leadership has
started to emerge strongly from London to Germany and France. Some are even
looking for grim prospects over the united European Union. Some even go beyond
that and suggest a new form of Fascism is emerging from Moscow Under Putin,
Ankara under Erdogan to Washington under Trump.
There
are some strong opinions, which argue that Trump administration would be more
“transactional” in its approach not only in economy but in political and
diplomatic domains as well. A
Trump-Putin convergence is one such move, which ask for ‘give and take’ approach
in the current geopolitical scenario. He may push for a deal in West Asia with
the Moscow over ISIL, Syria and would maneuver Russian support against the Beijing.
The
Trump Cabinet is also sounding a bad smell. The people he selected for top
cabinet posts have complicated background and even some are nurtured by the big
businesses. Some experts suggest that Trump administration would not go beyond big
business trajectory.
The
Donald Trump may have won the election through a well-drafted rhetoric, but it
would be an interesting period to watch and see whether he would go for that in
reality. But one thing can be easily inked down that America under the Trump
would not be an easy phase in the US politics domestically as well as globally.
A “Making America great again” would either push the Washington more
‘isolationist’ or more ‘interventionist’, may be in the military-industrial
business sense.
trump after all is not a politician but a businessman. it will take time for him to understand and adjust but it is too early to be pessimistic.let us see and hope for better.
ReplyDelete